There's no single universally correct number, but there is a well-established practical range that most genuinely coherent, professional-feeling brand and website palettes fall into, along with clear reasons why going meaningfully beyond that range tends to create real, visible problems. Revisiting this question periodically as a project grows is worth doing, since a palette that felt appropriately sized at launch can gradually creep larger over time without anyone quite deciding that on purpose.
A commonly cited practical range
Most functioning brand or website palettes work well with somewhere between three and six core colors: typically one primary brand color, one or two secondary or supporting colors, and a small handful of neutrals (usually a couple of grays plus black and white) for text, backgrounds, and borders. This isn't a strict rule, but it's a range that shows up consistently across well-regarded, professionally designed systems.
Why too many colors causes real problems
A palette with too many core colors makes consistent decision-making harder for anyone using it — with a dozen similarly-weighted color options, there's no clear default choice for a given element, which tends to produce a visually inconsistent result over time as different people or different moments make different, equally "valid" choices from an overly large set of options.
Why too few colors can also be limiting
At the other extreme, a palette with only one or two colors total can struggle to create enough visual hierarchy — distinguishing a primary action from a secondary one, or important content from less important supporting content, becomes difficult without at least a small amount of color variety to lean on alongside other tools like size and spacing.
Neutrals count, and they matter more than they seem to
Grays, off-whites, and near-blacks used for text, backgrounds, and borders are functionally part of a palette even though they don't usually feel like "the brand colors." A well-chosen set of two or three neutral tones does a large share of a design's actual visual work, which is exactly why the "how many colors" question should count these functional neutrals alongside the more visually distinctive brand colors, not treat them as a separate, uncounted category.
How tints and shades let a small palette go further
A genuinely small core palette (three or four colors) can still support a much larger range of practical use through tints and shades — lighter and darker variations of each core color, generated systematically via HSL lightness adjustments, covered in more detail in this site's HSL guide. This means "three or four colors" in practice often expands to a dozen or more usable values once these systematic variations are included, without ever feeling like an unwieldy, overly large palette.
A practical way to decide for a specific project
Starting with a deliberately small core palette (one primary, one secondary, a couple of neutrals) and only adding a new distinct color when there's a genuine, specific functional need — not just because it looks nice in isolation — tends to produce a more disciplined, cohesive result than starting broad and trying to narrow down later, which is a genuinely harder editing process than building up carefully from the start.
Try the Palette tool yourself — free, instant, nothing sent anywhere.
Open the toolFrequently asked questions
Is there an exact correct number of colors for a brand palette?
No single universal number, but three to six core colors (including neutrals) is a commonly cited practical range that balances enough visual variety against the risk of inconsistency from too many similarly-weighted options.
Do neutral grays and blacks count as part of a color palette?
Yes, functionally they do significant visual work in most designs and should be counted alongside more visually distinctive brand colors when thinking about total palette size, even though they don't always feel like "the brand colors" at first thought.
Can a small palette still feel visually rich and varied?
Yes, through systematic tints and shades of each core color, generated via lightness adjustments, a genuinely small core palette can expand into a much larger practical range of usable values without needing more distinct hues.
Is it better to start with a small palette or a large one and narrow it down?
Starting small and adding colors only when there's a genuine functional need tends to produce a more disciplined, coherent result than starting large and trying to edit down later, which is generally a harder process than building up deliberately.